Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) Peer-graded Assignment Solution

Get All How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) Quiz Answers

What you will achieve:

In this project-based course, you will outline a complete scientific paper, choose an appropriate journal to which you’ll submit the finished paper for publication, and prepare a checklist that will allow you to independently judge whether your paper is ready to submit.

What you’ll need to get started: This course is designed for students who have previous experience with academic research – you should be eager to adapt our writing and publishing advice to an existing personal project.

If you just finished your graduate dissertation, just began your PhD, or are at a different stage of your academic journey or career and just want to publish your work, this course is for you.

Enroll on Coursera

Peer-graded Assignment: Peer reviewing of an abstract Instruction

Peer reviewing is an important process of academic research. As such, developing one’s technique in this ability is very important for conducting research.

In this examination, you will write your own abstract about your research, and you will as well be part of a peer reviewing process, to review abstract of others. Both techniques are fundamental in order to progress concerning your ability to write a paper.

In order to write the abstract down, you will focus on the different parts of the abstract we explained in the video, and you will try to judge the abstract according to our previous directives.

Remember the different questions to answer in order to do effectively an abstract, and you will be able to do it…

Happy writing and peer reviewing!

Review criteria

The abstract would be submitted to peer review, and then should apply some principle:

  1. The abstract will be written in english, as it is the most common language of all the different scientific journal.
  2. The abstract should be readable and —almost— entirely readable by everyone, even if the person is not from your own field
  3. The abstract should be prepared for ONE journal, it can be a specific one or a very broad one like Science or Nature, it doesn’t matter, but it should be written for one journal only.

The evaluation of the abstract should focus on two different aspect:

  • The form of the abstract: the abstract should divided in three different parts, a broad introduction —with general concepts—, then a closer introduction —with concepts related to the writer’s own field—, and finally an overview of the results of the writer.
  • The content itself of the abstract: the abstract should answer the different questions we talked about in the video: Who are the intended readers ? What did you do ? Why did you do it ? What happened when you did that? What do your results mean in theory and in practice? What are the key benefits for the readers? And in a certain extend: What remains unsolved? (This last one is not needed for every article so check the journal you want to submit your article to!)

Peer-graded Assignment: Peer reviewing of an abstract Solution

PROMPT Write here your abstract Climate change has been the most argumentative issue of the
world over the last few decades where developing countries like Bangladesh have been
considered as most vulnerable to the forthcoming impacts. The geography, natural hazard
proneness, and socioeconomic condition has already exacerbated the susceptibility of
Bangladesh to extreme climate events. This study aims to identify the sectors of vulnerability
and to visualize the spatial vulnerabilities through multivariate analysis in Geographic
Information System (GIS).

In order to implement an integrated assessment, 30 socioeconomic
and 12 biophysical indicators have been incorporated in a combination of IPCC and UNFCCC
framework. Input raster layers of indicators have been normalized and analyzed in Python
module of ArcMap 10.5 to retain Principal Components (PCs). Through Catell’s scree test and
Kaiser’s criterion, 6 principal components have been identified. The meteorological shift
vulnerability (PC1) has identified the southeastern and western climatic sub-region consisting of
17 districts as highly vulnerable.

The extreme climate vulnerability (PC2) has shown the coastal
region with its 9 districts as highly vulnerable. Water related vulnerability (PC3) has been found
high in riverine areas as well as in other wetlands and comprises 8 districts. Socioeconomic
vulnerability (PC4) has been marked as high in south and hilly regions containing 35 districts.
Most regions of the country have been found moderate to less vulnerable to infrastructure and
information vulnerability (PC5).

However, hazard shock vulnerability (PC6) has been high in
southwest coastal region, central region and northeastern region, where households and crops are
usually affected due to a variety of natural disasters, consisting of 7 districts. The present study
however is a new edition in climate vulnerability assessment in Bangladesh since it encompasses
multivariate spatial analysis to demonstrate countrywide climate change vulnerability. Results
from this study should be an essential tool in taking proper measures related to the adaptation
and mitigation of climate change impacts from root level to policymaking platforms.

Peer-graded Assignment: Now it is your turn: the checking list Instruction

This is the final examination of the MOOC. It will allow you to integrate all the elements tackled in the MOOC in a single frame, that you can adapt to your research. As peer review is a key element in the academic world today, you will have to peer review the checklist of other MOOC participants.

In this examination, you will write your own checklist, and you will as well be part of a peer reviewing process, to review checklists of others. This will be the opportunity to highlight what you think is essential to publish in your community, but also to keep an open mind concerning what other communities look for, through the peer-reviewing process.

In order to write the checklist, you will have to synthesize all the different aspects of writing an academic paper that we have pointed out, and make it your own. You have to enrich your checklist through the results of the MOOC coursework.

Happy writing and peer reviewing!

Review criteria

To do the checklist, we advise you to do the following

1. The checklist has to be

  • Written in English
  • The checklist should be at least 3 pages long
  • Times 12, interline 1,15, margins 2,5 cm everywhere

2. It has to follow the principles of a checklist

  • Table format
  • Concise

3. It has to take into account all sequences of the MOOC, from how to put your research into context to finding specific references to include in the paper (pour nous: community, form, content)

4. We’re expecting you to organize and adapt the checklist to your research as follows

  • The checklist should be coherent and divided in blocks
  • In each block, you will raise a concern linked to a specific part of the article, and propose a way of dealing with this concern
  • The succession of block should be logical and follow a pattern taking into account the writing process and the social aspects of the submission process

To do the peer-reviewing part, we ask you to consider the following

1. Analyze form. You can use the following aspects

  • Originality
  • Practicality
  • Precision
  • Readability…

2. Analyze content

  • Do you think all the major elements addressed in the MOOC are taken into account?
  • Do you think the checklist is specific enough, in terms of scientific community?
  • Is it understandable by researchers outside of this specific scientific community?
  • Can you use elements of this checklist to add to your checklist?
  • How transposable to another paper is the checklist?
  • Is it easy to use? (Think add blocks, suppress blocks, re-organize blocks)
  • Is the succession of blocks coherent?

Peer-graded Assignment: Now it is your turn: the checking list Solution

Exam checklist

  1. Timetable
  2. Your exam number or student number
  3. Your student card or ID
  4. Pens/pencils
  5. Calculator
  6. A watch
  7. Prepare your clothes
  8. Special equipment
  9. Water
  10. Avoid tipp-ex

I hope this How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) Peer-graded Assignment Solution would be useful for you to learn something new from this Course. If it helped you then don’t forget to bookmark our site for more peer graded solutions.

This course is intended for audiences of all experiences who are interested in learning about new skills in a business context; there are no prerequisite courses.

Keep Learning!

More Peer-graded Assignment Solutions >>

Boosting Productivity through the Tech Stack Peer-graded Assignment Solutions

Essential Design Principles for Tableau Peer-graded Assignment Solutions

Creating Dashboards and Storytelling with Tableau Peer-graded Assignment Solutions

Intro to AR/VR/MR/XR: Technologies, Applications & Issues Graded Assignments

Conversational Selling Playbook for SDRs Peer-graded Assignment Solution

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *